| Power in Oblique Meridians. |
PAGE References to Optical Formulas Tutorial: (first reference is to edition 1 / second reference is to edition 2).

The diagram above is of a lens that has +1.00 diopters of power on the 180 or horizontal meridian, and +2.00 diopters of power on the 90 or vertical meridian. If you look at this lens in the focimeter (lensometer) you will get a nice clear image at +1.00D and another nice clear image at +2.00D, and in-between you will get fuzzy images of varying amounts. Below +1.00D or above +2.00D you will get fuzzy images that will rapidly become no image, just blur.
Remember the images that we got with a toric lens when we were talking about the focal length? For a refresher click here.
For our lens with one power of +1.00D and another power of +2.00D, there
are two focal lengths where the image will be clear but distorted; one
where it is out of focus but not distorted, and a range of distances where
it is both fuzzy and distorted. There will be times, especially when we
are talking about prism, that it will be helpful to determine the approximate
power at a meridian other than the major meridians.
If the power at other meridians was actual power, we would have sharp focal
lines. We do not have sharp focal lines anywhere except for the two major
meridian powers. The powers that we are going to compute are useful theoretically,
but they are NOT ACTUAL POWERS.
Lets look at the soda can that we used a few weeks ago. If you cut this
can in half horizontally you get a perfect circle. If you cut it vertically
you get straight lines. If you cut it diagonally you get something that
is between the circle and the straight line: it will never have MORE curvature
than the circle, it will be 'between' the circle and the line.
Suppose that
the surface to the left has +1.00 D of power on the horizontal and +2.00D
of power on the vertical. The cuts between these two powers are going to
have curvature between +1.00 and +2.00, but they are not circles, so they
are not perfect power. They will not have less curvature than +1.00 nor
will they have more curvature than +2.00. The curves will vary between
the major curves. But since they are not circular, they will be approximate
curves.
Yes?
So, we can approximate the power on the lens in any meridian, not just the major meridians. There is a general rule of thumb for approximate powers. It starts with two facts that you already know:
| 0 degrees away from the axis of the Rx, there is 0 times the cylinder
power.
90 degrees away from the axis of the Rx there is 1 times the cylinder power. |
What does this mean? 0 degrees away from the axis of the Rx is where there is only sphere power. When we have the Rx of +1.00 +1.00 x 180, on the 180 meridian, which is 0 degrees away from the axis of 180, none of the cylinder power is present. We have only sphere power on this meridian: the power on the 180 is +1.00 + (0)(+1.00) = +1.00D.
90 degrees away from the axis of the Rx +1.00 +1.00 x 180 is on the 90th meridian. On the 90th meridian we have all of the cylinder power of +1.00. So on the 90th we have +1.00 + (1)(+1.00) = +2.00D power. This is exactly the same thing that we learned when we talked about compound lenses.
Now we will add a third line to this rule: 1/2 way between the axis and 90 degrees away from the axis will have 1/2 of the cylinder power. So,
| 0 degrees away from the axis of the Rx, there is 0 times the cylinder
power.
45 degrees away from the axis of the Rx there is .50 times the cylinder power. 90 degrees away from the axis of the Rx there is 1 times the cylinder power. |
45 degrees away from the axis of 180 is 45. 45 degrees away from the axis of 180 is also 135. On both the 45 meridian and the 135 meridian, we have 1/2 of the cylinder, or (.50)(+1.00) = +0.50D of cylinder added to the sphere. So, on the 45 meridian and on the 135 meridian, we have +1.00 +0.50 = +1.50D of power.
| Did that look like the spherical equivalent? Well, that is exactly what it is. The spherical equivalent, which is the average of the two major meridian powers, is the approximate power halfway between the major meridians, or 45 degrees away from the axis of the prescription. |
Our next steps are at 30 and 60 degrees away from the axis. These are NOT halfway steps from 0 to 45.
| 0 degrees away from the axis of the Rx, there is 0 times the cylinder
power.
30 degrees away from the axis of the Rx there is .25 times the cylinder power. 45 degrees away from the axis of the Rx there is .50 times the cylinder power. 60 degrees away from the axis of the Rx there is .75 times the cylinder power. 90 degrees away from the axis of the Rx there is 1 times the cylinder power. |
On the 30th
meridian we have (.25)(+1.00) = +0.25 cylinder power to add to the sphere
power. So we have +1.00 + (0.25)(+1.00) = +1.25D power. Same for the 150
meridian. The 150 is 180 - 150 = 30 degrees away from the axis of 180,
so there is (0.25)(+1.00) cylinder to add to the +1.00 sphere, for +1.25D
of power.
On the 60th meridian we are 60 degrees away from the axis, so we have the sphere plus .75 times the cylinder: +1.00 + (0.75)(+1.00) = +1.75D of power.
Lets look at another one. Rx -4.00 -2.00 x045.
On the axis
45 we have 0 times the cylinder power plus the sphere power: -4.00 + (0)(-2.00)
= -4.00D. Right? This you already knew.
On the 135 meridian, which is 90 degrees away from the axis of 45 we have 1 times the cylinder power plus the sphere power. -4.00 + (1)(-2.00) = -6.00D. This you also already knew.
45 degrees away from the axis of 45 is 90 in one direction and 0 degrees in the other direction. So, on the 0/180 meridian and also on the 90 meridian we have 0.5 times the cylinder power plus the sphere power. -4.00 + (0.50)(-2.00) = -5.00D of power.
30 degrees away from the axis of 45 is 15 degrees and also 75 degrees. So, on the 15 degree axis and also on the 75 degree axis we have 0.25 times the cylinder plus the sphere. -4.00 + (0.25)(-2.00) = -4.50D of power.
![]()
That is the general 'rule-of-thumb' that you will need when you take the ABO exam, where calculators are not allowed. Next we are going to use the formula, where you will be able to find the approximate power on ANY meridian. This you will need throughout this course. You can always refer back to the 'rule of thumb' above in order to see if the answers you are getting are reasonable.
What we did above is say "the sphere power is in effect all over the lens, a portion of the cylinder is in effect at any meridian depending on how far the meridian is from the axis."
So in our formula we will find the portion of the cylinder that is in effect, and add that to the sphere power.
To do this, we need to find how far the axis we need is from the axis
of the Rx, just as we did in the rule of thumb above. Lets take an example:
Now, first, if you had no idea what I was doing with that "sin" stuff, it is short for 'sine', it is pronounced like 'sign', it is done with angles, and you need to go to the trigonometry link above and read. Learn all three of functions: sine, cosine and tangent, because in the next several weeks we will use all of them. Doing the exercises at the end of that lesson would be a really good idea.
Notice that I did not round the results to 1/8 diopter steps. This is not a power that you will order from the lab or record in the glasses wearer's records. It is an approximation that is found as a step to finding out something else. We do not round the oblique meridian power to eighths.
Here are the steps to follow to do this formula:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lets do a few more of those.
One final example.
You did not punch the
key
at all for this problem because the sphere and cylinder were both
positive, not negative.
![]()
OK, now read the pages (62-63 / 75-77) in Optical Formulas Tutorial for the description of the formula, make sure that you understand the examples there, do the exercises on page (63 / 77), and check your answers in the back of the book. Then do these for more practice, and click on the link to see what our answers should have been.
EXERCISES:
![]()
