| Vertex Distance Compensation |
PAGE References to Optical Formulas Tutorial: (first reference is to edition 1 / second reference is to edition 2).
Vertex Distance Compensation.
Remember when we were talking about having two lenses in an optical
system, and I showed you that just by putting space between the two lenses
we could change the total power of the optical system without changing
the power of the lenses? Adding distance between the lenses increased plus
power (or decreased minus power).

A glasses prescription represents the amount of power that needs to
be added to the eye's optical system at a particular distance from the
eye in order to bring light rays to a point focus at just the right
place. Whether this refraction is done in a phoropter or an auto refractor,
the distance that the test lenses are from the eye is the refracted
vertex distance.
We are not going to go into the way the refractionist has of determining
the refracted vertex distances. When the wearer comes to us with prescription
in hand, it is assumed that the glasses will fit at about the same distance
from the eye that the refractionist used.
For most prescriptions the vertex distance for the glasses can be off
by several mm and not create a problem. The glasses would have to have
more than
10.00D of power for a 2 mm change to
be noticeable to most wearers. For a larger change in vertex distance,
such as converting from glasses to contact lenses, you need only have power
over
4.00D
for a noticeable difference to occur. I am told that some ABO review
books indicate that vertex distance changes should be considered any time
the refractive error is
7.00 or more.

The vertex distance for contact lenses is zero. This is the distance
from the front of the cornea to the back of the contact lens. For glasses,
the measurement is not so simple.
Opticians basically have three ways of measuring the vertex distance.
-
THE RULER: if you stand facing the wearer's side and hold your ruler against
the temple and the side of the frame, you can approximate the distance
from the front of the cornea to the frame. You are basically guessing where
the back of the lens at the optical center is with respect to the frame.
And, since the distance will probably be 8-18 mm, and you would be doing
this with one eye, the change in angle that you would have looking at the
side of the ruler would also give you an error (called parallax error.)
This is the low tech, cheap, least accurate way to take the measurement.
-
The next best way to take this measurement is with the corneal reflex pupilometer.
Some pupilometers come with two scales on the top for each eye, only one
of which you use when you take the PD, and a fixed line near the outside
edge in the viewer.
Stand to the wearer's side and hold the pupilometer up to the temple, in
the same position shown for the ruler, but with the pupilometer where the
ruler is. Get the fixed line aligned with the front of the cornea,
then move the other line to where the frame is. Then you read the vertex
distance off of the scale that you have been ignoring -- the one that starts
at 1 mm. You are still guessing where the back of the optical center of
the lens will be with respect to the frame, but this is more accurate than
using the ruler. And, once you get the hang of it, it is relatively easy
to do.
-
The third method is the distometer, which is described in the Optical
Formulas Tutorial on page (65 / 78). If there is no lens in the glasses you
will be using the demo lenses to approximate where the back of the lens
will be. If the lenses are to be edged normally this will probably be adequate.
If you are changing bevel placement or increasing curves to control image
size then you will have to adjust your vertex distance for those changes.
This is the most accurate way we have of taking this measurement, and is
also easy once you have practiced it a few times.
OK, read through pages (64-70 / 77-84). My recommendation: read it through once for
basic understanding, then go back and read it carefully following the examples.
Then come back here before you try to do the exercises. While you are reading
please ignore the approximation formula. It was important back in the days
when we did not have calculators because it was mildly easier to do than
the exact formula if you were using paper and pencil. Now that calculators
are easy to come by you do not need the approximation. Please learn the
exact formula.

Done reading? Did you follow the examples through?
Please go back to the top of page (70 / 83) and reread the Notes, particularly the second one. This is IMPORTANT!!!!!
And what you need for real life is in the "What you really need to know" table on page
(69 / 83).
Lets try a few.
-
The Rx reads: OD -15.00DS, refracted vertex distance 10 mm. The glasses
fit at 8 mm vertex distance. What effective power will the wearer experience
if you order a -15.00D lens? What power would you order instead to compensate
for the change in vertex distance?
.
First, decide what SHOULD happen. It is a minus lens moving toward
the face, so the lens looses plus power or gains minus power. Therefore
the effective power should be stronger than -15.00D, and the compensated
power should be weaker than -15.00D.
.
-
EFFECTIVE POWER
The change in vertex distance is 2 mm, which equals 0.002 m. The lens
moved toward the face, so d is positive. Dl is -15.00. What is De?
Dl
De = ---------------
1 + dDl
-15.00
De = -----------------------------------
1 + (+0.002)(-15.00)
-15.00
De = --------------
0.97
De = -15.46
The wearer would be experiencing about one-half of a diopter to much minus
power. (Which only a 35-45 year-old myope would object to.) (Which does
not excuse doing it.)
-
COMPENSATED POWER
The change in vertex distance is 2 mm, which equals 0.002 m.
The lens moved toward the face, so d is positive. Dl is -15.00.
What is Dc?
Dl
Dc = ---------------
1 - dDl
-15.00
Dc = ----------------------------------
1 - (+0.002)(-15.00)
-15.00
Dc = --------------
1.03
Dc = -14.56
The correct lens to order is -14.50DS. I would call the refractionist
first to make sure that this is acceptable and to have this recorded in
the wearer's records.
Having trouble getting my answers? Look at the first one. There are a lot
of ways to punch this into the calculator, some of which work correctly
all of the time. If some of your answers are close to mine, but some are
not within 0.01 or 0.02, then here is the way to punch it in:
-15.00
De = --------------------------------------
1 + (+0.002)(-15.00)
Punch 0.002, "x", 15.00, "
", "=",
"+", 1, "=", and write down the denominator. Now punch 15.00, "
",
"
", the denominator, "=". This
will give you the right answer for effective power.
When you do compensated power there is just one more plus/minus in there:
-15.00
Dc = ------------------------------------
1 - (+0.002)(-15.00)
Punch 0.002, "x", 15.00, "
", "=",
"
", "+", 1, "=", and write down the
denominator. Now punch 15.00, "
",
"
", the denominator, "=". This
will give you the right answer for effective power.
-
change in vertex distance;
if lens is moved away from the wearer's eye
|
d, [ ] |
-
times original power;
if power
is negative
|
x Dl, [ ] |
-
if finding what the new lenses
should
be
|
[ ] |
|
|
+ 1 |
-
write it down, save it in memory, [or press 1/x]
|
[1/x] |
-
original power times what you wrote down or saved in memory,
if original power was negative
|
x Dl [ ] |
-
The Rx reads: OS +12.50DS, refracted vertex distance 9 mm. The glasses
fit at 12 mm vertex distance. What effective power will the wearer experience
if you order a +12.50D lens? What power would you order instead to compensate
for the change in vertex distance?
.
First, decide what SHOULD happen. It is a plus lens moving away from
the face, so it gains plus power. Therefore the effective power should
be stronger than +12.50D, and the compensated power should be weaker than
+12.50D.
.
-
EFFECTIVE POWER
The change in vertex distance is 3 mm, which equals 0.003 m. The lens
moved away from the face, so d is negative. Dl is +12.50. What is
De?
Dl
De = ---------------
1 + dDl
+12.50
De = --------------------------
1 + (-0.003)(+12.50)
+12.50
De = --------------
0.9625
De = +12.99
The wearer would be experiencing about one-half of a diopter to much power.
-
COMPENSATED POWER
The change in vertex distance is 3 mm, which equals 0.003 m. The lens
moved away from the face, so d is negative. Dl is +12.50. What is
Dc?
Dl
Dc = ---------------
1 - dDl
+12.50
Dc = -----------------------------------
1 - (-0.003)(-12.50)
+12.50
Dc = --------------
1.0375
Dc = +12.05
The correct lens to order is +12.00DS. I would call the refractionist
first to make sure that this is acceptable and to have this recorded in
the wearer's records.
.
-
The Rx is OD -8.50 -3.25 x180, refracted at 9 mm. You dispense the glasses.
A week later the wearer comes back to you complaining that the street signs
look the same as they used to in his old weaker glasses, and the Doctor
has assured him that they would be much clearer. What do you do?
.
After checking everything else you determine that the glasses were
made perfectly, the PD's are correct and the OC's are 3 mm below his pupil
center where they were on his old glasses. You used the same base curves,
the pantoscopic angle and the face form are all as they should be or as
they are in his old glasses. The only real difference is that the new glasses
fit at 13 mm, where the old ones were at the same 9 mm as the refraction.
[What you really want to do is get him into something that fits closer
to his face. Suppose that, for some reason, he does not want that. Maybe
his eyelashes have grown?]
Lets look at the effective power that he is seeing, and then decide
what you should order for these glasses that fit too far away from his
face.
First, you must notice that the power in this lens is -8.50D on the
180 meridian and -11.75D on the 90th meridian. You have to determine the
effective power in each meridian, then create an Rx again.
-
EFFECTIVE POWER. This is a minus lens moved away from the face. It will
be effectively weakened. (Which is why he could not see the street signs
any better than before.)
-
On the 180 meridian:
The change in vertex distance is 4 mm, which equals 0.004 m. The lens
moved away from the face, so d is negative. Dl is -8.50. What is
De?
Dl
De = ---------------
1 + dDl
-8.50
De = -------------------------------------
1 + (-0.004)(-8.50)
-8.50
De = --------------
1.034
De = -8.22
The effective power on the 180 meridian is -8.22D, not -8.50. If all the
Doctor did was increase his power by a quarter diopter of minus, moving
the lens away simply gave him back his old power!
-
On the 90 meridian:
The change in vertex distance is 4 mm, which equals 0.004 m. The lens
moved away from the face, so d is negative. Dl is -11.75. What is
De?
Dl
De = ---------------
1 + dDl
-11.75
De = -----------------------------------------
1 + (-0.004)(-11.75)
-11.75
De = --------------
1.047
De = -11.22
The effective power on the 90 meridian is -11.22D, not -11.75.
The 180 meridian is -8.22D, the 90 meridian is -11.22D, so the effective
power that the wearer is experiencing is -8.22 -3.00 x 180. NOT
what the Doctor ordered!
-
COMPENSATED POWER: he needs more minus to get what the Doctor has intended.
-
On the 180 meridian:
The change in vertex distance is 4 mm, which equals 0.004 m. The lens
moved away from the face, so d is negative. Dl is -8.50. What is
Dc?
Dl
Dc = ---------------
1 - dDl
-8.50
Dc = ----------------------------------
1 - (-0.004)(-8.50)
-8.50
Dc = --------------
0.966
Dc = -8.80
The power needed on the 180 meridian rounds to -8.75D.
-
On the 90 meridian:
The change in vertex distance is 4 mm, which equals 0.004 m. The lens
moved away from the face, so d is negative. Dl is -11.75. What is
Dc?
Dl
Dc = ---------------
1 - dDl
-11.75
Dc = ------------------------------------
1 - (-0.004)(-11.75)
-11.75
Dc = --------------
0.953
Dc = -12.33
The power on the 90 meridian should be -12.25D.
The 180 meridian is -8.75D, the 90 meridian is -12.25D, so the lens power
that could be ordered is -8.75 -3.50 x180. After having the
new compensated prescription recorded in the Doctor's files.
Why did I round the power on the 180 meridian to -12.25 instead of -12.37,
resulting in a cylinder amount of -3.62? Well, it was half-way in-between,
and at that power I tend to round weaker when it could go either way. It
would be a good idea to ask the Doctor which cylinder would be preferable
for this wearer.
OK, go back to the Optical Formulas Tutorial and do the exercises
on pages (67 and 70 / 80-81 and 83-84). Check your answers in the back of the book. Then read pages
415 - 419 (top left) in System for Ophthalmic Dispensing and do
exercises 1-7 on page 424.
NOTE: In Systems for Ophthalmic Dispensing Dr. Brooks
refers to the adjusted power as effective power, both to determine
what power the wearer experiences based on the position of the lens and
to determine what power to order to result in what the refractionist intended
the wearer to see. This is because he uses the technique of determining
the adjusted focal length of the lens based on where it is positioned.
Either method is correct, and both result in the same answer. When
using the formulas shown in this lesson use the wording in the problem
to determine what you should be finding: if asked what to order (which
is the only really important issue here) use the compensated power formula.

Want some more to do?
-
The Rx is +14.00 -2.00 x 045. Refracted vertex distance is 10 mm. Worn
vertex distance is 7 mm.
-
What effective power will the wearer experience if you fit it as is?
-
What would you order instead?
-
If you fit this patient with a contact lens that is the spherical equivalent
of the glasses lens, you will be starting with a power of +13.00. What
effective power will the wearer be experiencing?
-
What contact lens might you start the fitting with, instead of the +13.00?
The page with the answers is here.
If you are comfortable with this, and like the algebra, you may
want to go to this page, which has the derivation
of the formula. This is not required reading, so if you don't enjoy algebra,
you have my permission to skip it.
