PAGE References to Optical Formulas Tutorial: (first reference is to edition 1 / second reference is to edition 2).
Back Vertex Power.
Remember when we were talking about having two lenses in an optical
system, and I showed you that just by putting space between the two lenses
we could change the total power of the optical system without changing
the power of the lenses? Adding distance between the lenses increased plus
power (or decreased minus power).

The same thing happens with lens surfaces. Adding distance between the
surfaces increases the plus power of the lens, or decreases the minus power
of the lens.
It also matters which side of the lens the ray of light goes through
first. If the ray goes through the more curved side first, the thickness
has more effect than if the ray goes through the less curved side first.
The lens has more plus power (or less minus power) if it goes through the
more curved side first. The lens has less plus power (or more minus power)
if it goes through the less curved side first.

In the lenses above when a ray travelling parallel to the axis goes
through the plano side first no refraction occurs. The only refraction
occurs at the convex surface. If the surface powers in the lens above are
plano and +5.00D, then the nominal power formula, pl + 5.00 = +5.00, gives
the correct power for the lens. But when the same ray goes through the
+5.00 side first it is not travelling parallel to the axis by the time
it reaches the plano side. So the plano side is going to cause the ray
to change directions again, and the power will be greater than +5.00.
Remember when we discussed the nominal power formula that I told you
the definition of 'nominal' was "in name only, not in fact; as, the nominal
leader." The nominal power formula is acceptable for minus glasses lenses
because we make them as thin as we can. It is also acceptable for plus
glasses lenses up to about +4.00D. Over +4.00D the lens thickness begins
to affect the power of the lens. When lenses are made for other optical
instruments or for special purposes where we are purposely increasing the
thickness, then even lenses below +4.00D will be affected.
The formulas for front and back vertex power are on pages (151-154 / 84-86) of
the Optical Formulas Tutorial. Please read these pages and follow
the example. Do not do the exercises yet. Also, please do not use the approximation
formula. Back in the days when we did not have little cheap calculators
the approximation formula was "easier" to do with paper and pencil. With
calculators it has no advantage over the exact formulas. Also, do not be
concerned with the "equivalent power" on page (152 / 85). If you
are having fun and want to continue reading after the course is over, THEN
read about the equivalent power before you go on to Section VII!
Done reading? Did you follow the examples through?
We will do a thick plus lens from both sides, then a thin plus lens
with the same surface powers. Then we will do the same for a thick and
thin minus lens. Then we will do a lens that should be plano. Notice what
is happening for each type of lens. We will make each lens out of a 1.50
plastic, so that the index will not affect anything. Ready?
-
The first lens has a front surface of +10.00DS, and a back surface of -2.00DS.
The nominal power of this lens is +8.00DS, right? First we will
consider it with a thickness of 20 mm, then we will consider it at 5mm
thick. (No, the 20 mm thick one will never go in a pair of glasses. It
might do in a microscope or some other imaging system; in this case it
would be bi-convex. This is an exaggeration so you can see what thickness
does.)
-
BACK VERTEX POWER, thicker lens.
D1 = +10.00D
D2 = -2.00D
t= 20 mm = 0.02m
n = 1.50
D1
DB = -------------- + D2
1 - (t/n)(D1)
+10.00
DB = -------------------------------------- + (-2.00)
1 - (0.02/1.50)(+10.00)
+10.00
DB = ------------------------ + (-2.00)
1 - (0.133333)
+10.00
DB = ------------------ + (-2.00)
0.8666666
DB = +11.54 + (-2.00) = +9.54DS
So, the thick lens, with the ray going through the most curved surface
first, has a power of +9.54D instead of the +8.00D that we expected from
the nominal power formula.
-
FRONT VERTEX POWER, thicker lens.
D1 = +10.00D
D2 = -2.00D
t= 20 mm = 0.02m
n = 1.50
D2
DF = -------------- + D1
1 - (t/n)(D2)
-2.00
DF = ---------------------------------- + (+10.00)
1 - (0.02/1.50)(-2.00)
-2.00
DB = ------------------------ + (+10.00)
1 - (-0.0266666)
-2.00
DB = ---------------------- + (+10.00)
1.0266666
DB = -1.95 + (+10.00) = +8.05DS
So, the thick lens, with the ray going through the least curved surface
first, has a power of +8.05D instead of the +8.00D that we expected from
the nominal power formula. Not much of a change, in spite of the thickness,
is there?
-
BACK VERTEX POWER, thinner lens.
D1 = +10.00D
D2 = -2.00D
t= 5mm = 0.005m
n = 1.50
D1
DB = -------------- + D2
1 - (t/n)(D1)
+10.00
DB = ----------------------------------------- + (-2.00)
1 - (0.005/1.50)(+10.00)
+10.00
DB = ----------------------- + (-2.00)
1 - (0.033333)
+10.00
DB = ----------------- + (-2.00)
0.9666666
DB = +10.34 + (-2.00) = +8.34DS
So, the thin lens, with the ray going through the most curved surface first,
has a power of +8.34D instead of the +8.00D that we expected from the nominal
power formula. It is noticeably stronger than what we expected, but it
is nowhere near as strong as that thick lens was.
-
FRONT VERTEX POWER, thinner lens.
D1 = +10.00D
D2 = -2.00D
t= 5mm = 0.005m
n = 1.50
D2
DF = -------------- + D1
1 - (t/n)(D2)
-2.00
DF = -------------------------------------- + (+10.00)
1 - (0.005/1.50)(-2.00)
-2.00
DB = ------------------------ + (+10.00)
1 - (-0.0066666)
-2.00
DB = --------------------- + (+10.00)
1.006666666
DB = -1.99 + (+10.00) = +8.01DS
So, the thin lens, with the ray going through the least curved surface
first, has a power of +8.01D instead of the +8.00D that we expected from
the nominal power formula.
Front Surface +10.00 DS, Back Surface -2.00 DS
| Nominal power +8.00 |
thick lens, t = 20 mm |
thin lens, t = 5 mm |
| front vertex power |
+8.05
|
+8.01
|
| back vertex power |
+9.54
|
+8.34
|
The next two lenses are for you to do for an exercise. The answers will
be on the link, as always. WORK ALL OF THEM. I know it is boring. Do it
anyway. Make a table for each one like the one above. Notice
the pattern of what happens depending on the thickness and the order in
which the ray meets the surfaces.
-
This lens has a front surface of +2.00DS, and a back surface of -10.00DS.
The nominal power of this lens is -8.00DS, right? First we will consider
it with a thickness of 20 mm, then we will consider it at 5 mm thick.
-
BACK VERTEX POWER, thicker lens.
D1 = +2.00D
D2 = -10.00D
t= 20 mm = 0.02m
n = 1.50
D1
DB = -------------- + D2
1 - (t/n)(D1)
Go for it.
-
FRONT VERTEX POWER, thicker lens.
-
BACK VERTEX POWER, thinner lens.
-
FRONT VERTEX POWER, thinner lens.
-
Now for the 'plano' lens. Front surface power of +6.00DS, back surface
power of -6.00DS, first thickness 20 mm, second thickness 5 mm, all of
1.50 plastic.
-
BACK VERTEX POWER, thicker lens.
-
FRONT VERTEX POWER, thicker lens.
-
BACK VERTEX POWER, thinner lens.
-
FRONT VERTEX POWER, thinner lens.
Click here for the answers.

OK, here is what I would like you to take away from this lesson.
-
Be able to determine the front or back vertex power of a lens.
-
We do not round this power to 1/8 diopter steps. The lab computer takes
this calculation into account when it tells you what surface power to place
on the back of the lens. This is not something that you will do when you
order the lenses. It is not something that you need to keep in mind when
you dispense the glasses. Since it is not something that you will order,
or record on the wearer's records, you do not need to round it to eighths.
-
Realize that the thicker the lens the more plus (less minus) power it has.
-
Realize that the side that the ray goes through first is the one acted
on by the thickness. So,
-
for the back vertex power, the front surface is the one in that big fraction.
-
for the front vertex power, the back surface is the one in the big fraction.
-
If the first surface the ray goes through is the most curved surface (and
convex) then the power will be more plus than if the first surface is the
least curved surface. This, along with the fact that minus lenses in glasses
do not get very thick, is the reason this is of interest in high plus Rx's,
but not in high minus Rx's.
-
The back vertex power is what the wearer of the glasses is seeing.
-
The back vertex power is what the focimeter (lensometer) gives us when
we place the glasses with the temples pointing away. The optics of the
focimeter insures this.
-
When we turn the glasses around and read the difference between the distance
and reading powers for the nominal add power, we are taking the difference
between front vertex powers. This is the correct way to read add power
if the segment is on the front surface of the lens. In the increasingly
rare instances where the bifocal segment is on the back surface of the
lens, the differences should be read from the back, as the distance is.
-
Front vertex power is used in Contact Lenses. (Do not ask me why. I do
not know.)
OK, go back to the Optical Formulas Tutorial and do the exercises
on page (154 / 86). Check your answers in the back of the book. Also, read pages 419-423
in Systems for Ophthalmic Dispensing, and do problems 8-13 on page
424.
